Well, I’ve been eagerly awaiting Paul Copan’s response to my review of his book, and as I expected, he brought in reinforcements. I am glad he did so. I am glad to have the further opportunity to respond to Richard Hess’s arguments, and I am also glad that Matt Flannagan got to get his frustrations with me out in the open. It’s good for him; it’s good for me, and I think it’s right that readers should be aware of my flaws.
Anyway, I’ve written a response to each of the three posts that were published yesterday on Parchment and Pen. See footnote for their posts.1