Religion at the Margins
  • Home
  • About
  • Contributors
  • Our Books
  • Contact Us
  • Discussion Decalogue

Counting Blue Cars

By Ted Troxell


I knelt in front of the minister, whom I’d sought out for this very purpose: to be anointed with oil and prayed over in order to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. By this I mean that I wanted to speak in tongues. I grew up very anti-charismatic; in the Church of Christ there were three things we definitely weren’t: charismatic, Catholic, or Calvinist. But the theology of my childhood faith seemed flat and sterile compared to those who were experiencing more than just heady assent to doctrine, who were getting some kind of taste of God that I had been denied. I don’t remember if this was before or after my Catholic phase, but it doesn’t matter. In that moment, I thought that maybe, just maybe, if I opened my mouth I could let fly with the language of angels. It was, if I can be forgiven the pun, right on the tip of my tongue. If I just gave things the slightest push, if I tried, maybe I could manifest the sign I was looking for.

In the end, it was that push that did me in. I knew that, on some level, I would be making it happen, that I would be having this experience predicated on the fact that I wanted to have this experience. I really think it was possible, but somehow I also knew it wasn’t going to be the thing that I was looking for, the thing that I now suspect doesn’t exist — not for people like me.

I wanted something that I couldn’t disbelieve, something so overwhelmingly real that it would reorient the rest of my life. Some so real it would make me real. I was, by this time, already starting to doubt my legitimacy as a Christian. I didn’t feel the gushy Jesus stuff other people felt. People would tell me things like “I can just see the power of God on you when you lead worship” but I knew in my heart it was a kind of performance, and one that would obtain whether I was leading worship or playing in a bar. I pour myself into the music that I play, even when I don’t like the music in question, because that’s what we do as musicians. I can couch that in Christianese — I used to joke that “it’s not worship unless you sweat” but I knew it was the music, and this made me feel fake.

The minister reassured me that sometimes it doesn’t happen right away, that later down the road, at some random moment, I might be ravished by the Holy Spirit — that the prayer and the anointing had done their work, and not to worry. I wasn’t worried, but I was pretty sure nothing was going to happen. Emily Dickinson famously refused to go forward during a revival at Holyoke, even though most of her peers were caught up in ecstatic frenzy. Simone Weil, for all practical purposes an atheist, was enamored of the Church but never joined because she felt she belonged outside, if only just. William James, in his famous Varieties of Religious Experience, seems smitten by mystics, recognizing some kind of validity to their experience, which he felt was denied him. Kathleen Norris quotes someone — Levertov, maybe, or Sexton? — who said “I love faith, but I have been denied the gift of faith.”

I recently had a brief exchange with Cheryl Ensom Dack over at Peter Walker’s blog. She too, has been looking for an encounter with God, though she narrates things differently than I do. And with no such encounter forthcoming, she’s moved on. She’s open to God if he decides to show up, but she’s not holding her breath. I’ve always wondered if Simone Weil’s title Waiting for God was an allusion to Beckett’s Waiting for Godot, in which the title character never arrives, but I don’t know. Either way, I relate to these people, those of us begging for scraps at the existential banqueting table.

But that’s not quite right, either. It’s more like we’re watching other people eat sand, and rave about the gourmet dining, knowing that it’s not sand to them, and yet unable to undertake the act of surrender necessary to taste the prime rib ourselves. The wine and bread refuse to transubstantiate, and whether a priest says hoc est corpus meum or a parlor magician says “hocus pocus” it’s not going to change anything.

We’ve got it wrong, our friends say; we want to know so that we might believe but we must, as Augustine said, believe that we might know. We can’t have this experience because we won’t have this experience. We nod and we smile. We say “I know, I know,” and wave our hand dismissively. We might even agree. But we also know that we won’t because we can’t. We can’t will ourselves to believe just so that we might have a particular kind of experience and still believe the experience the way that others do. We’d always know we made it happen. We’d always know we surrendered to the particular conditions necessary to have a certain kind of experience and that’s all it would mean, all it would ever mean.

This is the deal we made, though we didn’t know we were making it. This is our Faustian bargain, but at the end there’s no devil anymore with whom we might negotiate: no backsies, no do-over, no mulligan.

We wanted to know something. Wanted to see something. We had some kind of insatiable curiosity about systems, about meaning, about language, about human thinking. Something to do with the “linguistic turn” and poststructuralism and Heisenberg and semantic structures and science fiction and religion and God knows what else and we don’t even remember when the turning point was, just this never-ending ratchet click, click, click, no turning back we already took the red pill the toothpaste is out of the tube the water is not turning into wine into blood and no, Goddammit you’re not going to speak in tongues because you’d just be making it up and you know it.

It feels, at times, a little like madness.

We’ll sometimes poke fun at the true believers because of their blindness but at the same time we covet what their blindness gives them. We see people raising their hands in worship, and not just for show but out of some depth of spirit, and we wonder what that’s like. We hear people choke up in the middle of a puerile but heartfelt prayer and we wonder what it would take to move us so completely. We hear people talk about their deep, personal relationship with God or Jesus and we think: really? What on earth would that be like? Not just to experience that — it’s not that simple — but to be the kind of person who can?

But we traded off. We chose something different. We can’t go back, and we wouldn’t anyway. We didn’t get cheated, not really. We got exactly what we were looking for. We all do.

Tell me all your thoughts on God.

This post was written by

Ted Troxell – who has written 17 posts on Religion at the Margins.

Ted Troxell is a PhD candidate in American studies at Michigan State University. His dissertation, in progress, will explore the relationship between religion and politics through the lens of Christian radicalism and the political ramifications of pacifist ethics. He teaches English composition, American studies, and music appreciation as an adjunct for Central Michigan University and Alma College. His interests include religion, politics, music, popular culture, and creative nonfiction. He also likes cats. He can be found on Facebook, usually drinking coffee and grading papers.

Send an Email

Subscribe to this author's posts feed.
Share


This entry was posted on September 28, 2010 at 10:43 PM and is filed under Religion.

  • Emily

    I can’t tell you how exactly this post expresses how I feel. Once a fundamentalist, I made the charitable mistake of looking at my faith from the outside–surely the arguments for Christianity were so good only a stubborn God-hater could read them and still disbelieve. I was wrong, and now I can’t get back inside the box. I miss it but I’m more glad I’m out.

  • http://religionatthemargins.com Ted Troxell

    Thanks for the response, Emily. All I can say is: we’re not alone. :)

  • naekwon

    Love this line:

    “God knows what else and we don’t even remember when the turning point was, just this never-ending ratchet click, click, click, no turning back we already took the red pill the toothpaste is out of the tube the water is not turning into wine into blood and no, Goddammit you’re not going to speak in tongues because you’d just be making it up and you know it.”

    I’m sharing this with a friend whose struggling through this very thing. Thanks for articulating these thoughts for us.

  • http://blog.merefaith.org Chris S

    Ted,

    I’d really like to meet Her. And ask Her why we’re who we are.

    In some ways, our background is very similar. I have never been comfortable with the “gushy Jesus stuff” of the “true believers” who seem to think God has told them what to order for lunch at Wendy’s. I’ve always asked questions, wanted to know why, and I never take things for granted. And yet my experience has been actually quite opposite yours. When I wasn’t seeking any particular encounter, I had one – powerful, sudden, and overwhelming. It was the night I, to use the hackneyed language, “felt” the “call” to ministry.

    This happened at youth camp. The next year I tried to get God to repeat the fireworks, to no avail. As for speaking in tongues, I had one night in college in which that experience came upon me, also not explicitly invited, and frankly it scared me. Unlike my call experience, I didn’t push for a sequel.

    The call didn’t change my feelings on the gushy stuff. Nor has that first numinous night frozen my thinking, reading and questioning as if a spiritual experience is epistemological grounds for cementing all one’s theological suppositions on the spot. I have changed in many ways since then, and I expect there is more to come. I have doubted, prodded, dissected that evening repeatedly. Perhaps it was a head fake. Perhaps it was the God of Israel. Something happened that remains a mystery and it has defined the direction of my whole life.

    I take seriously the testimony of the mystics that special divine encounters – especially the contemplative communion that is considered the height of experience – are gifts of grace and not the assured results of human effort. Everything I’ve seen suggests that we may do some preparatory work, but that too much seeking is counterproductive as it is a longing for the gift rather than the Giver (to draw upon Augustine in a different way: a disordered desire for something before the the Creator). And, it seems, some of us present ourselves simply receptive before the awesome Mystery only never to receive at all. Why that is the case, I don’t know. Perhaps there is a plan afoot in the communal sharing of stories as some of us bring what we have and some of us bring what we lack.

  • http://religionatthemargins.com Ted Troxell

    Chris,

    Thanks for writing. A lot of stories that begin “One night in college” end very differently. :)

    I appreciate the contemplative tradition and those who seek to practice it. I’m definitely not a hater. And I like the tagline of your blog: “Discipleship in the ruins of empire.”

    I guess if I were to attempt a push-back, it would to observe that your caveat applies, mutatis mutandis, to other forms of human practice. Not every musician who practices their scales and submits to the repertoire gets that spark that makes them artists rather than technicians. Not every athlete who undergoes the training regimen has the “stuff.” Not everyone who stills the soul in prayer hears the voice of God. Maybe all of those things, when they happen, should be narrated as grace and as gift.

  • http://blog.merefaith.org Chris S

    Ted,

    A fair rejoinder, and perhaps we should speak of such talents as gifts (in fact, many often do). But a major difference between mystical experience and the skill of a musician or athlete is that the latter always requires practice and development. We have ample testimony of the numinous arriving unbidden without hours spent in prayer and meditation. Sometimes the grace is about as grace-full as it can be!

  • http://trailblazerministries.blogspot.com Jesse

    I’m a cellist, and play on the worship team every Sunday. Outside of that I’m a professional musician. I’ve been married for 6 years and I feel as though all my wife wants me to do is return to Jesus. I’ve given up prayer, small groups, worship sessions ect. It’s just really hard to have “faith” in something I can’t tangibly experience. I’ve been waiting on God for way too long. I’m ready for a supernatural vision.

  • http://religionatthemargins.com Ted Troxell

    Jesse, your name is familiar from some Facebook context or another, I think, or maybe Thom’s blog. The interwebs all bleed together after awhile.

    Anyway, at the risk of cliche, I feel you. I recently ran across a quote from Milbank in which he takes a postmodern theologian to task for trying to have his cake and eat it too:

    This is exactly the sort of pusillanimous theology of some in the 1960s that we have long sought to escape from. Why? Because it is bad faith. If you are going to be an atheist and nihilist, then be one. Only second-raters repeat secular nostrums in a pious guise.

    And I wonder: is this me, too? Should I give up the pretense? Do I really believe anything? Do I care?

    On the other hand, I’m playing bass in church this Sunday.

  • http://trailblazerministries.blogspot.com Jesse

    Yeah, I’ve seen your name also Ted. I’ll add you. My wife wishes I could either “be strong” or leave the faith. She’s obviously a black and white person. I decided to give church a break for awhile, my wife will be attending alone.

  • http://TheologyAndCulture.wordpress.com Aaron

    Great post. My “baptism in the holy spirit” is a nigh identical testimony. Concerning speaking in tongues, the pentecostals that surrounded me (not theologically sophisticated) reassured me, “Don’t listen to doubts of the Enemy, just open your mouth and let the syllables come.” I threw ‘em a bone and muttered a random syllable or two at max, but that was it.

    I think one issue in this picture is that we live in this post-existential world, where we have to “feel” something for some kind of “authenticity.” But Augustine would counter that love is not a feeling, but an act of the will. That being said, I still appreciate the position that can’t muster the will. Indeed, Augustine would add that the willpower is itself a gift of grace.

  • Emily

    I grew up pseudo-Baptist, and always thought speaking in tongues was potentially legit but also weird. I first actually saw people doing it in the documentary film “Jesus Camp” and while they certainly were sincere, I could never bring myself to try (especially not now because I would be “making it up and know it” like ted’s blog post says), but also I think it sounds like the Ewok chatter from Return of the Jedi. Maybe I’ve always been lacking in the reverence department, who knows.

Archives

Recent Posts

Does the Messiah Die in Targum Jonathan After All?

Note to Self - Now Available

The Torturous Death of Richard Carrier's Dying Messiah

Homeland (in)Security Gets Religion

Neil Godfrey's Reading Comprehension

The Death of Richard Carrier's Dying Messiah

Break on Through (To the Other Side)

Blasphemy for God's Sake

Profiling America Fundraiser Launches

Another Attempt To Discredit My Book Discredits Itself

How Many Deceptions Can a Fundamentalist Pack into One Book Review?

To Tell the Old, Old Story

You Broke It, You Buy It: A Divine Mandate

Note to Self Wins Award at Worldfest-Houston

Bohemian Rhapsody

Building a Mystery

2011 in Film: Best, Worst, and in Between

I Am a Terrorist Sympathizer

Turnin' Thirty: A Musical Retrospective

A Call to Arms: Matt Flannagan's War against Who-Gives-a-Damn

Recent Comments

  • Gravatar icon of Thom Stark Thom Stark
    May 11, 2012 (4:42)
    The Death of Richard Carrier's Dying Messiah Grog, Your first question: "What would have caused first century Jews to "just start saying" that...
  • Gravatar icon of Fiona Leonard Fiona Leonard
    May 10, 2012 (4:43)
    Gay Rights and Christianity: Why African Americans Have Been Silent Really enjoyed reading your article. I'm currently living in West Africa in a country where homos...
  • Gravatar icon of Andrew Andrew
    May 9, 2012 (10:56)
    Blasphemy for God's Sake It's pretty difficult to the defend Yahweh Sabaoth in our modern times any way you slice it. He f...
  • Gravatar icon of Thom Stark Thom Stark
    May 9, 2012 (5:10)
    The Death of Richard Carrier's Dying Messiah Your first paragraph is uninformed (see my latest two posts, "The Torturous Death of Richard Carr...
  • Gravatar icon of Anonymous Anonymous
    May 9, 2012 (4:15)
    The Death of Richard Carrier's Dying Messiah The Jewish association of the Suffering Servant of Isaiah with the Messiah is the point. The targ...

Subscribe to Email Notifications

Enter your email address:


Follow this blog







  • Does the Messiah Die in Targum Jonathan After All?

    Does the Messiah Die in Targum Jonathan After All?

  • Note to Self – Now Available

    Note to Self – Now Available

  • The Torturous Death of Richard Carrier’s Dying Messiah

    The Torturous Death of Richard Carrier’s Dying Messiah

  • Homeland (in)Security Gets Religion

    Homeland (in)Security Gets Religion

  • Neil Godfrey’s Reading Comprehension

    Neil Godfrey’s Reading Comprehension

Marginally Significant Other Websites

Back
Forward
The Human Faces of God
Irritable Reaching
Unorthodoxology
Exploring Our Matrix
Michael J. Iafrate
Rock and Theology
Diary of a Christian Universagnostical
Undeception
Bryan Berghoef
Killing the Buddha
The Immanent Frame
Religion Dispatches
Diglotting
Daniel O. McClellan
Rollston Epigraphy
Remnant of Giants
Hesed we 'emet
Otagosh
Rachel Held Evans
Dancing on Saturday
Jesus Radicals
Jesus Needs New PR
Common Sense Atheism
Unreasonable Faith
Charitable Atheism
Login | Logout
Copyright © 2011 Religion at the Margins. All Rights Reserved.
Back to Top

  • RSSRSS
  • TwitterTwitter
  • FacebookFacebook
  • NetworkedBlogsNetworkedBlogs
  • Social Slider
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • NetworkedBlogs